Build an AI research tutorial publisher

Overview
Automation
June 14, 2026Updated June 28, 2026AutomationAI research publishing workflow

Create a scheduled publishing workflow that turns current AI papers, AI lab updates, and agent tooling news into sourced developer tutorials.

AutomationAI researchScholarly sourcesPublishing

What you will build

This tutorial shows how to build a scheduled AI research publisher. It fetches scholarly and industry sources, scores items for agentic systems topics, drafts a developer tutorial, validates required sections, and writes a Markdown file into content/tutorials.

The app reads that folder at build time, so every committed Markdown file becomes a /tutorials/[slug] page.

Workflow

Research-backed tutorial publishing loop

  1. 1

    Collect sources

    Fetch scholarly, research-lab, industry, starter-project, and example-reference sources from the allowlist.

    Why: The source list gives the agent a bounded research perimeter.

  2. 2

    Score relevance

    Rank titles and summaries against agent workflows, tools, memory, RAG, security, evals, and operations topics.

    Why: Scoring keeps the daily topic connected to the blog's teaching mission.

  3. 3

    Draft the article

    Generate or deterministically assemble a tutorial with frontmatter, steps, examples, and references.

    Why: The output must be a useful build guide, not a news recap.

  4. 4

    Validate shape

    Check required frontmatter, step-by-step instructions, examples, and source links before writing.

    Why: Validation makes automated publishing less dependent on prompt luck.

  5. 5

    Build and commit

    Run lint/build, then commit the generated Markdown through GitHub Actions.

    Why: The site only publishes material that survives the normal app quality gate.

  6. 6

    Review and improve

    Periodically inspect generated posts, source quality, and stale topics.

    Why: Automation should increase publishing cadence without lowering editorial standards.

Setup
3

Before you start

  • Node 20+ and npm
  • Git repository write access for content/tutorials
  • Optional OPENAI_API_KEY for AI-drafted tutorials

Step 1 - Review the source allowlist

Open content/tutorial-sources.json. The default source set focuses on:

  • arXiv API searches for agents, retrieval, LLMs, memory, safety, and AI security;
  • OpenAI news RSS;
  • Anthropic research and engineering pages;
  • Google DeepMind and Google Research pages;
  • Microsoft Research AI updates;
  • AWS generative AI engineering posts;
  • the four Eldergenix starter repositories;
  • the example workflow articles supplied for this project.

Add sources only when you would be comfortable linking them from the final tutorial.

Step 2 - Run the generator locally

npm run daily:tutorial

Without an API key, the script writes a deterministic implementation tutorial from fetched source titles. With OPENAI_API_KEY, it asks the model to draft a full tutorial while preserving required frontmatter, workflow blocks, reasoning blocks, examples, and references.

Optional settings:

OPENAI_API_KEY=...
OPENAI_DAILY_TUTORIAL_MODEL=gpt-4.1-mini
DAILY_TUTORIAL_MAX_ITEMS=12
npm run daily:tutorial

Step 3 - Inspect the generated Markdown

Each generated file must include:

  • title, summary, date, level, tags, and source URLs;
  • step-by-step instructions;
  • a workflow block that shows the build path;
  • a reasoning block that explains tradeoffs and boundaries;
  • an example command, prompt, or code block;
  • references;
  • no hidden prompts, secrets, or private data;
  • no duplicate slug for the same day.

The script refuses to write a draft if the required tutorial shape is missing.

Step 4 - Build the site

npm run lint
npm run build

Open /tutorials and the generated detail route. Confirm the tutorial card appears first and the source links render at the bottom of the page.

Step 5 - Let GitHub Actions publish daily

The workflow at .github/workflows/daily-ai-tutorial.yml runs every day, creates a tutorial, verifies the app, commits the new Markdown file, and pushes it back to the repository.

Set repository secrets when you want AI-authored drafts:

  • OPENAI_API_KEY
  • OPENAI_DAILY_TUTORIAL_MODEL if you want a model other than the script default

If no key is configured, the workflow still publishes a structured developer tutorial from the fetched source metadata.

Operational reasoning: keep the workflow's commit step narrow. It should only publish generated tutorial content after the script and build finish successfully, not rewrite source registries or application code.

Step 6 - Editorial review workflow

For fully automatic publishing, keep the workflow as-is. For human review, change the action to create a pull request instead of pushing to main.

Recommended daily review checks:

  1. Verify every cited source URL loads.
  2. Remove weak claims that are not directly supported.
  3. Add a runnable example if the AI draft stayed too abstract.
  4. Keep security notes concrete.
  5. Prefer tutorials over news summaries.

Step 7 - Expand the tutorial strategy

After the four starter projects, use the publisher to rotate across these tracks:

  • agentic workflow patterns;
  • agentic tool design and MCP;
  • memory architectures;
  • RAG and retrieval evaluation;
  • AI security best practices;
  • observability and evals;
  • AI-for-science workflows;
  • governed data agents;
  • production agent operations.

The publishing loop should teach how to build with current tools, not merely report that a tool exists.

Tutorial
Guide

Answer Engine Summary

Create a scheduled publishing workflow that turns current AI papers, AI lab updates, and agent tooling news into sourced developer tutorials. Use this tutorial to turn AI research tutorial publisher into a buildable workflow with prerequisites, source citations, implementation examples, review boundaries, and proof artifacts.

For AI search, the extractable answer is direct: AI research tutorial publisher should be implemented as a bounded workflow with clear setup, source-grounded behavior, human review for risky actions, and a verification artifact before it is reused or scaled. The supporting keywords are Automation, AI research, Scholarly sources, Publishing, AI research publishing workflow.

Source-Backed Guidance

This guide uses info.arxiv.org, OpenAI documentation, Claude Code documentation, deepmind.google, and research.google as its source baseline. Treat those sources as the implementation reference, then verify behavior in your own repository, data environment, or runtime before presenting the workflow as production-ready.

SEO elementRecommendation
Primary queryAI research tutorial publisher
Search intentimplementation guide
AudienceContent and research teams building source-backed AI tutorial publishing workflows.
Citation angleExplain the build path, cite the source behavior, and show the verification artifact
Related internal pathsUse adjacent tutorials with matching tags.

Implementation Examples and Checks

ExampleHow to use itProof to capture
First setup passStart with Node 20+ and npm.Command output, config diff, or local route evidence showing the environment is ready.
Controlled implementationUse Git repository write access for content/tutorials for one narrow, reviewable case.A small artifact, report, test, retrieval result, or code diff that a reviewer can inspect.
Source-grounded reviewCompare the result against info.arxiv.org.A reference link plus notes on what changed from the source example.
Expansion decisionUse Optional OPENAI_API_KEY for AI-drafted tutorials as the owner, approval input, or readiness check for the next scope.A written pass/fail decision with owner, limitation, and next action.

FAQ

FAQ

FAQ for AI research tutorial publisher

What does this tutorial help me build?

It helps you build or evaluate AI research tutorial publisher as a bounded workflow with setup steps, implementation examples, source citations, and verification evidence instead of a loose prompt or concept note.

Which keywords should this page target?

Target AI research tutorial publisher as the primary phrase, then support it with Automation, AI research, Scholarly sources, Publishing, AI research publishing workflow. Use those phrases in natural headings, examples, metadata, and related links rather than repeating them mechanically.

How should I validate the implementation?

Run the smallest command, route check, retrieval test, or code review that proves the workflow works in your environment. Capture the output and keep it next to the source references.

What should stay human-reviewed?

Keep data access, customer-facing output, regulated decisions, production code changes, financial actions, and destructive operations behind human review until logs, approvals, and recovery paths are proven.

How often should I refresh this tutorial?

Refresh it when the linked source docs, SDK behavior, model interfaces, or deployment target changes. AI-agent and RAG tutorials should be rechecked at least quarterly because platform behavior moves quickly.

Related resources
1
References
5
Stefan Creadore · @Eldergenix - generated and hand-seeded tutorials for governed agent systems